In February, I had my first immersive theatre experience at
a play called The Drowned Man. For those
unfamiliar with this type of performance, immersive theatre essentially erases
the typical divides between performers and audience members. The audience is allowed to wander through the
performance space and interact with sets, props, and actors. In the case of The Drowned Man in
particular, audience members don full-face masks before entering the
performance space of a five-floor warehouse in which approximately thirty
actors, each with their own narrative strand, perform.
From the moment that I began watching the many performers
interacting in and with the theatre, I was hooked. The way that each performer reacted so
uniquely to the space and to their fellow performers astounded me.
Within the next three hours, I decided while watching a riveting
combination of modern-rodeo dancing and acting, I had to see all the
performers. I had to witness every
scene. I had to find every nook and
cranny on each of the five floors. I had
to touch all the props. I had to figure
out how these thirty narrative strands all connected. And if I was going to do all of this within
the three allotted hours (three hours!
Once that had seemed an infinite amount of time for a show, yet now it
seemed no more than a breath), I needed
to stop watching this particular scene and get moving onto the other scenes.
But despite my desire to see everything contained within
this show, I did not desire to leave my current location. I wanted to watch the rest of this dance, to
explore further the pub set design, to observe the characters’ carefree
mannerisms and tangled relationships, to note the lights flashing from yellow
to blue, to breathe in the scents of beer and wood paneling. My choice was pretty simple – stay or go –
but I felt stranded by its weight. I
realized that if I went, I would certainly have time to see everything, but I
would not have time to experience it – and if I stayed, I would not have nearly
enough time to see everything . . . but those things that I did see, I could
experience from every angle, with every sense, as complete and unified wholes.
I decided to stay.
This epiphany impacted not just my time at The Drowned Man, but my entire semester
in London . Many times, I was confronted with the choice
between trying to see everything (going on a whirlwind day tour of all of
London, walking through the entirety of the British or Victoria & Albert
museum, food sampling my way through a festival) and trying to sustain my
attention on one or two things (touring a single district of London, loitering
in two or three rooms at a museum, having a sit-down meal). It wasn’t until attending The Drowned Man, however, that I was
able to articulate these oppositions, or that I was able to realize my
preference for the latter.
It’s easy to bemoan all of the things that I did not and
will not do this semester. But my
commitment to maintaining sustained attention for the things I did do has created memories richer in
detail and happiness, and I owe that to the theatre.
Who ever said the arts aren’t beneficial to our real lives?
[image via the National Theatre]

No comments:
Post a Comment